18+ National Responsible Gambling Programme 0800 006 008. Winners know when to stop. Get help
Beta Prices are read about every four minutes and published with the time we saw them. Real prices, read about every four minutes. Why?Tell us what is wrong

The prices here are real and they are ours. We read the bookmakers on our board roughly every four minutes and publish what we actually saw, with the time we saw it. Nothing on this site is estimated, modelled or bought in. We hold no data agreement with any bookmaker, so a price can be a few minutes old and the bookmaker's own price is the one that counts. How live is this?

So why call it a demo? Because we are a data company, and data gets better with time. Every day we run, the price record gets longer, the licence register gets more complete and the ranking rests on more evidence. Some pages are still being written and a few bookmakers are not fully covered yet.

We would rather be useful now than perfect later. What is here already answers the question most punters never get answered: who is actually paying most, right now, and who is actually licensed to take your bet. Waiting another six months to publish that would help nobody.

Where we are unsure, we say so. Where we have not checked something, we do not claim it. If you find something wrong, tell us and we will fix it and say we did.

LicensedBets Live odds

Deposit terms, read in full

When your own deposit is locked until you bet it.

Deposit, change your mind, ask for the money back, and at five South African bookmakers their own terms say it has to be staked first. No bonus is involved, and four of them apply it to every deposit you ever make. This is the clause, in each operator's own words.

5 of 33 bookmakers4 apply it to every depositRead 9 August 2026

The short answer

Five bookmakers require a deposit to be wagered before it can be withdrawn, with no bonus involved. It is not a wagering requirement in the usual sense. Nobody has to claim anything, opt in to anything or take a free bet for it to apply. It is a condition on the money you put in yourself, and at four of the five it applies to every deposit you ever make, not only the first.

The requirement is the deposit itself rather than a multiple of it: one pass through the tills, not five. Four of the five say so in as many words, with "full amount", "full value", "in full" or "fully wagered". What differs between them is which deposits the clause catches, which is why that is a column of its own.

The clause, bookmaker by bookmaker

Quoted rather than summarised, because a reader checking our wording against theirs should find the same sentence.

South African bookmakers whose published terms require a deposit to be wagered before it can be withdrawn. Read from each operator's own site. 18+ only.
Bookmaker Which deposits Their words Read
10bet all deposits "To withdraw funds, you must wager the full amount of your deposits at least once." 09 Aug 2026
Betbus all deposits "deposits must be wagered at least once prior to withdrawal" 09 Aug 2026
Easybet all deposits "If the value of a deposit has not been played through in full once before a withdrawal is requested, Easybet reserves the right to refuse a requested withdrawal" 09 Aug 2026
Playabets all deposits "Before any withdrawal is processed, the full value of the deposited funds must have been wagered (played through) at least once."
Two independent sources: the live error string in their cashier, and clause 8 of their published terms. We previously held only the error string.
09 Aug 2026
Hollywoodbets crypto deposits only "The entire amount deposited through Pay with Crypto must be fully wagered with Hollywoodbets." 09 Aug 2026

Hollywoodbets is listed last because the clause is the narrow one: it is written against one deposit method rather than against everything you put in. A card or EFT deposit is not what that sentence describes, so on the reading above it is not caught by it.

Why this matters more than a wagering multiple

A bonus wagering requirement is the price of something you were given. You can read it, decide it is not worth it, and decline. This is a condition on money that was always yours, applied by default, and the place most people meet it is the cashier, after the deposit, when the withdrawal is refused.

The practical effect is that a deposit at these five is not a reversible decision. If you fund an account on a Friday and think better of it on Saturday, the money still has to be staked at least once before it can come back out, and staking it once means accepting whatever the result of that bet is. On any account where you were only ever going to bet the balance anyway, the clause costs you nothing. On a deposit you regret, it is the only term that matters.

The one we checked twice

The Playabets clause stands on two readings rather than one. Two independent sources: the live error string in their cashier, and clause 8 of their published terms. We previously held only the error string. That is the difference between telling you what a cashier once said to us and showing you the term the bookmaker publishes, and it is why that row is stated rather than hedged.

Where the promotions page and the cashier disagree

10bet's promotions page says: "There are no unreasonable rollover requirements and odds restrictions that make it impossible for you to clear the bonus."

No wagering multiple is published for the bonus. The binding term is elsewhere: 10bet's cashier requires the DEPOSIT to be wagered in full before any withdrawal, bonus or not. Their promotions page meanwhile states there are no unreasonable rollover requirements.

Read on its own terms that sentence is about clearing a bonus and it may well be fair. The condition in the table above is not a bonus condition at all, it is not on the promotions page, and it binds a customer who never touched the offer. If you read only the page advertising the offer, you would not know it existed.

Read from their promotions page on 9 August 2026.

In their own words

Two more clauses about getting your own money back

Neither of these is a wagering rule. Both decide what happens to money you funded yourself once you ask for it back.

Easybet

Voucher deposits can never be refunded

"Under no circumstances will refunds be considered for Easyload, 1voucher, OTT and Bluvoucher voucher transactions."

Vouchers are how people without a bank card deposit, so the customers with the fewest options get the least protection.

Read 9 August 2026.

Betbus

You must withdraw back to the method you deposited with

"we ask our customers to use the same method when making a withdrawal as used previously when making deposits"

Deposit by voucher or card and you cannot simply take the money out to your bank of choice.

Read 9 August 2026.

What we have not read

28 of the 33 bookmakers on this site are not in the table. That means we have not read a clause of this kind in their terms, and nothing more. Some will not have one. Some will have one on a page we did not reach, or worded so that a search for the obvious phrase misses it. That is how this clause hides: it sits under withdrawals rather than under bonuses, and one of the five above never uses the word wager at all.

Before you deposit anywhere not listed here, the question worth asking support in writing is short: if I deposit and do not bet, can I withdraw? An answer in writing costs nothing and settles it.

How this was read

Every quote on this site is verbatim from the operator's own page. Where words between two quoted passages are omitted, the omission is marked with an ellipsis. Text is never condensed, rejoined or repunctuated inside quotation marks: an earlier version of this file did that to five quotes and it was wrong, because a reader checking our wording against theirs would have found a mismatch and had every reason to distrust the rest.

Read from each operator's own site on 9 August 2026. Bookmakers change their terms without notice, so check the current version before you deposit. If a clause here is out of date or we have it wrong, tell us and we will fix it and say that we did.