18+ only National Responsible Gambling Programme: 0800 006 008. Winners know when to stop. NRGP: 0800 006 008 Responsible gambling help
Licensed Bets

Bookmaker comparison

ZAR Bets vs ApexBets

Both ZAR Bets and ApexBets carry recently issued WCGRB bookmaker licences, and both are tracked-partner bookmakers. ZAR Bets has the longer track record (licence issued 28 March 2024) and a casino-aligned welcome; ApexBets has the freshest WCGRB licence (issued 26 November 2025) and a casino-landing affiliate route.

ZAR Bets review Open license, payment, and responsible gambling checks. ApexBets review Check the operator evidence before visiting the operator. Verify both licenses Use the same checklist on both operators.

Pick by need

Which one fits your needs?

Need Pick Why
Longer track record under WCGRB ZAR Bets WCGRB licence 10010581-031 was first issued 28 March 2024.
Most recent WCGRB licence issue ApexBets WCGRB licence 10194002-002 was issued 26 November 2025.
Casino-aligned welcome offer ZAR Bets 125% match up to R3,750 + 25 Free Spins on the Casino welcome landing.

ZAR Bets

ZAR Bets (consumer-site brand ZARbet) is operated by Apollo Gaming (Pty) Ltd, registration number 2024/307627/07. Checked 2026-05-16, the official Zarbet footer states Apollo Gaming is licensed and regulated by the Western Cape Gambling & Racing Board under Bookmaker Licence Number 10010581-031, first issued on 28 March 2024. Registered address is Office 203, Spaces V&A Waterfront, Cape Town, 8001.

  • License evidence: Current official licence evidence captured
  • Payments: Card, EFT or bank-transfer options as listed in the cashier, Voucher or cash channels as listed in the cashier
  • Payout note: Confirm method-specific fees, withdrawal limits, and timeframes directly from the live operator cashier and terms before relying on this page for payout-speed claims.
Read review Open ZAR Bets welcome offer

ApexBets

ApexBets is operated by Letsbet (Pty) Ltd under Western Cape Gambling and Racing Board Bookmaker Licence 10194002-002, issued 26 November 2025. The licence is recent; the brand is establishing its long-term track record but the regulator record is verifiable.

  • License evidence: Current official licence evidence captured
  • Payments: Card, Instant EFT, Voucher methods as listed
  • Payout note: Withdrawal speed is newer and should be verified on the cashier; published speeds are still settling at this newly licensed brand.
Read review Open ApexBets

Decision rule

Use this comparison as a shortlist, then confirm the live license wording, product scope, identity checks, withdrawal terms, and responsible gambling controls before opening or funding an account.

Comparison method

Do not choose on one signal

A useful ZAR Bets vs ApexBets answer should not crown a bookmaker because of one promotion, one payment rail, or one brand impression. The safer comparison is layered: first check that both operators show current South African license wording, then confirm the product being compared, then read the payment and withdrawal terms that apply to the account.

ZAR Bets may be stronger for one reader and ApexBets may be stronger for another because needs differ. A payment-focused reader needs method evidence, a bonus-focused reader needs wagering and expiry rules, and a safety-focused reader needs visible account controls and support routes before any operator visit.

Next step

Best next step for serious users

Read both operator reviews before visiting an operator. The review pages hold the maintained evidence record for licence status, affiliate route, payment notes, cautions, and source URLs. This comparison should help a reader pick which review to inspect first, not replace the live terms from each bookmaker.

If a bonus, app, sport, or withdrawal page points here, the same rule applies: dated evidence wins over generic ranking language. Licensed Bets updates the comparison when either operator changes license wording, affiliate terms, cashier methods, responsible gambling links, or product-scope disclosures.

Reader-first verdict

This comparison is useful only when it is more specific than a generic top-list. It tells the reader what each operator is currently being used for, what still needs verification, and which official pages to open before funding an account.

Sources checked